Agreed with you sir .🍖x20

valid points. but "nowhere near as open" might be a stretch don't you think?

The third statement is what I love about fc “using fc as a social login for crypto” I know that were so early because there’s so much more waiting to be built

have you made some angel investments into projects on top of farcaster?

what product are you looking forward to the most that you'd like to be built on farcaster?

Using Farcaster for social login in both online and offline worlds is a game-changer, of course While you’re right about that, I keep wondering will farcaster overcome the limitations of current networks like Twitter and how?

looking forward to it, any project/product in particular you're looking forward to?

It's an amazing place for builders. We'll continue to build. https://warpcast.com/leeknowlton.eth/0x070ed383

Absolutely agree. Farcaster's potential as a universal social login for both online and offline interactions is exciting. Its open nature sets it apart from other networks like Twitter, offering a unique and versatile solution

+1, to me Farcaster's biggest value prop outside the app is Social Graph as a Service

spot on, the importance of ownership of identity both as a user and builder can't be overstated

I would like to know what product will appeal to you the most! Share it to build.

should not be open that way

social login stablished can be a great success could be interesting to see a big mass adoption and also in a near future be linked with your validated wallets, so no need to add wallets in w3 sites as all would be done from your WC login, this would be great.

take a look at Camp - bridges web2 and web3 identity so apps/protocols have access to a users full digital behavior (ie Web3 music app seeing the precise songs someone streams on Spotify, combined w their onchain music activity, combined w Twitter behavior) https://mirror.xyz/0xa01A821E654b923Be011acE131A22Ba58cFee3ad/Dw-8uaZ_OGZ3ZqizKxHs728WBulXap-8j3uionmwpO4

How are the contracts that control the FC IDs governed? It was a 1 of 2 mulitsig but haven’t recently checked. Do you think, whatever the current gov setup is, it’s appropriate for the protocol? Is open & forkable ‘sufficient’ governance wise or should contracts be deployed as a Governanceless registry?